Legal Opinion

William Alfred Giddens v. Isbrandtsen Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 3, 1966No. 9980_1PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge:

Laches as a bar to recovery of damages for a personal injury resulting from a maritime tort occurring on Virginia waters should be determined largely by reference to the Virginia 2-year statute of limitations, the District Court has held. It dismissed, as stale, the action at law brought by William Alfred Giddens against Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. for injuries he suffered, not quite 3 years before, while working as a longshoreman aboard the company’s SS Flying Clipper in Hampton Roads. As we think the State law should not be given such significance, we reverse.

The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Gardner v. Panama RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Kloth v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  2. White v. DanielCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  3. Dameron v. Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1984
  4. TAG/ICIB Services, Inc. v. Pan American Grain Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  5. Orville Leland Davis v. Adult Parole AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API