Legal Opinion

Paige v. Manuzak

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 15, 1984No. 687, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLOOM, Judge.

In the fall of 1976, appellant Daniel E. Paige began to suffer from chest congestion and a persistent cough. His symptoms also included fever and sweating. Consequently, Mr. Paige made an appointment to see appellee Hubert Manuzak, a physician engaged in the practice of family medicine. On October 22 Dr. Manuzak examined Mr. Paige, took a complete history from him, measured his height and weight, took his temperature and blood pressure, performed a urinalysis, and ordered chest x-rays. Dr. Manuzak initially diagnosed Mr. Paige’s problem to be bronchitis and emphysema, for which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. I. W. Berman Properties v. Porter Bros.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Rinaudo v. BloomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  5. Pumphrey v. KehoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Farley v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Weimer v. HetrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Virginia Christine Waffen v. The United States of America, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. Wilson v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Myers v. Celotex Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API