Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Vandruff

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1927No. 17392PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY, C.

This was originally two separate actions commenced in the justice of the peace court in and for the town of Fairfax; one by defendants in error, T. C. Vandruff and Mat Davis, herein called plaintiffs, against Mark Freeman, defendant, for the sum of $75 damages alleged to have been caused by the negligent burning of plaintiff’s stacks of hay; the other by T. C. Van-druff against Mark Freeman for $200 for the loss of about 1,500 acres of standing dry grass, alleged to have been caused by fire negligently set out by defendant and his employee. The two cases were tried separately in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lookabaugh v. EppersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Freeman v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Southwestern Cotton Seed Oil v. the Bank of StroudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  4. Forry v. BrophySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. City of Anadarko v. ArgoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Padgett v. McKissickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Insurance Company of North America v. SheinbeinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Mullendore v. Sohio Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  4. Mullendore v. Sohio Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API