Legal Opinion
United States v. Simon
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 3, 1967No. 66 Cr. 831PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge:
Defendants Simon, Kaiser and Fish-man are certified public accountants, the first two of whom are members of the prominent accounting firm of Lybrand, Ross Bros. & Montgomery (Lybrand), and the third a senior associate of that firm. They have pleaded not guilty to a six count indictment filed on October 17, 1966, charging them with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and to make false statements in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1001, 1341; 15 U.S.C. § 78ff, and with substantive mail fraud offenses. 18 U.S.C. §§ 2,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. BirrellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- United States v. Carl Simon, Robert Kaiser and Melvin Fishman, and Harold Roth, Irving L. WhartonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- United States v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- United States v. HasiwarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.