Legal Opinion

United States v. Delvi

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 17, 2003No. 01 CR.0074 SASPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

The Government intends to call retired Detective Jeremy Rosenberg of the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”) to testify to certain events related to the murder of Earl Edwards and the shooting of Xavier Giles on December 19, 2000. The government seeks to admit, through Detective Rosenberg, a statement made to him by Giles approximately forty minutes after the shooting. Defendants object. For the reasons that follow, the statement is admissible as an “excited utterance” under Rule 803(2) of the Federal Rules of Evidence.

I. FACTS

The shooting of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Joseph A. Puleio v. George A. Vose, Jr., Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Alexander, JoeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. UvinoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
  3. Anderson v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
  4. United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API