United States v. Stoddard, Haserick, Richards & Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
This is a petition by the United States to review the action of the board of general appraisers in sustaining a protest of importers, the question involved being tbe precise time when tbe Dinglcy law went into effect.
1Opinion of the Court
COLT, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition for review from the decision of the hoard of general appraisers. The importation in ques*700tion consisted of a quantity of wool which arrived in the port of Boston on the forenoon of July 24,1897. The goods were entered for consumption before 12 o’clock noon of that day, and a permit of delivery from the collector and naval officer was at once placed in the hands of the importer, stamped “Free,” under the provisions of paragraph 685 of the tariff act of 1894. By direction of the treasury department, the entries were afterwards liquidated by the collector,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Arnold and Others v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- Louisville v. Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Bemis v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Lapeyre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nunn v. William Gerst Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- In re LedbetterDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1920
- United States v. Hurlburt & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- United States v. Stoddard, Haserick, Richards & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1899
- J. B. Ellison & Sons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.