Legal Opinion

Seattle-First National Bank v. Frye

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1939No. 26645. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

In this cause, which arose in a probate matter, the respondents, who, for convenience, will be hereinafter referred to as defendants, demurred to the petition filed by the petitioner, who will be referred to as the plaintiff. The demurrers were heard on November 24, 1936, and the trial court orally announced that they would be sustained for want of sufficient facts. The plaintiff asked for leave to amend and, over objection, was granted leave to amend within two weeks. On the next day, she voluntarily moved for a dismissal without prejudice and without costs. On the same day, the defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goldtree v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Findley v. FindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Provencher v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. German Mexican Co. v. Mexican Pacific Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. Gold Seal Vineyards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API