Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1976No. 75-236PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

The sole item in controversy in this appeal is whether the record before us is supportive of the submission to a jury of the issue of wanton misconduct on the part of Norfolk & Western Railway.

If the record provides no basis for a finding of wanton misconduct, the trial court should have granted the motion for a directed verdict by defendant Norfolk & Western. Absent such action by the trial judge on such a record, the Court of Appeals should have entered final judgment for this defendant.

The Court of Appeals correctly concluded that the plaintiff was a trespasser as a matter of law. This…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roszman v. SammettOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Scibelli v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Bailey v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Kline v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Hawkins v. IvyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Wills v. Frank Hoover SupplyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. McKinney v. Hartz & Restle Realtors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API