Brooks v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
The sole item in controversy in this appeal is whether the record before us is supportive of the submission to a jury of the issue of wanton misconduct on the part of Norfolk & Western Railway.
If the record provides no basis for a finding of wanton misconduct, the trial court should have granted the motion for a directed verdict by defendant Norfolk & Western. Absent such action by the trial judge on such a record, the Court of Appeals should have entered final judgment for this defendant.
The Court of Appeals correctly concluded that the plaintiff was a trespasser as a matter of law. This…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roszman v. SammettOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Scibelli v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Bailey v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Kline v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Hawkins v. IvyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Wills v. Frank Hoover SupplyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- McKinney v. Hartz & Restle Realtors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.