Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hartley v. Clausen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1928No. 21538. En BancPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

As stated when the case was here upon a former appeal, 146 Wash. 588, 264 Pac. 403, this action was brought for the purpose of restraining the majority of the highway committee from employing and paying Thomas ft. Beeman as secretary and consulting engineer for the committee. Upon that appeal, the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded for trial. The principal question there involved was whether the relator had the right to maintain the action and it was held that he had such right. Incidentally it was held that the complaint stated a cause of action. As a result of the trial in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Ness v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Sweitzer v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Yeargin v. MaschkeWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State Ex Rel. Porter v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. State ex rel. Port of Seattle v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State Ex Rel. Gray v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. CraigWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re Cashmere State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API