Torrez v. Milk Products, L.P.
District Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FURGESON, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 24), Plaintiffs Response, and Defendant’s Reply. Having considered the written briefs and the evidence submitted, the Court finds that Plaintiff has been unable to adduce evidence of a genuine issue of material fact as to one or more elements of his causes of action. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This case arises from Plaintiffs complaint that he was terminated from his…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Siddiqui v. AutoZone West, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
- Mills v. City of ShreveportDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019
- Skylar Adams v. Franciscans Missionaries of Our Lady Health System et alDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2025