Legal Opinion

Schutter v. Soong

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1994No. 17282PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAMIL, Justice.

Attorney David C. Schutter (Schutter) petitions this court for a special proceeding to review his two convictions for contempt of court and for writs of mandamus and prohibition. Schutter contends that the convictions for contempt of court and sentences should be vacated because: (1) First Circuit Court Judge Melvin Soong (Judge Soong) failed to disqualify himself; (2) the actions for which he was cited with contempt did not constitute contempt; (3) Judge Soong failed to make an on-the-record determination of whether Schutter understood the contempt charges; (4) Judge Soong…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State v. BrownHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Peters v. JamiesonHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. MataHawaii Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. MerinoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. DaviaHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. SilvaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. State v. ChowHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API