Legal Opinion

State v. Mata

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1990No. 13887, 13904PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PADGETT, J.

These are appeals from two cases tried on consecutive days. Defendant-Appellant Ronald Mata (Mata) was charged with, and convicted of, driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of HRS § 291-4(a)(l) and (2). Defendant-Appellant Santos Ancheta (Ancheta) was charged and convicted of driving under the influence in violation of HRS § 291-4(a)(l) only. The same judge presided over both trials. The appellants were represented by the same firm of attorneys. Virtually identical motions for disqualification of the trial judge were filed, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whittemore v. FarringtonHawaii Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bronster v. United States Steel Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. OrtizHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. CummingsHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. RossHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Conklin v. Warrington TownshipDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API