Legal Opinion

State v. Gamez

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1992No. C0-92-845Published

1Opinion of the Court

494 N.W.2d 84 (1992)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,

v.

Ruben GAMEZ, Appellant.

No. C0-92-845.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 29, 1992.

Review Denied February 23, 1993.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Wm. F. Klumpp, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Raymond F. Schmitz, Olmstead County Atty., Rochester, for respondent.

Jack S. Nordby, Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and DAVIES and FLEMING,[*] JJ.

OPINION

WILLIAM J. FLEMING, Judge.

Appellant Ruben Gamez challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction on two…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. LanamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. State v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. United States v. GideonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1856

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API