Legal Opinion
Advance Dental Care, Inc. v. Suntrust Bank
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 30, 2012No. Civil Action No. 10-cv-01286-AWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant SunTrust Bank’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Doc. No. 49. The court has reviewed the motion papers and attached exhibits and concludes that no hearing is necessary. Loe. R. 105.6 (D. Md. 2011). For the reasons discussed below, the Court will GRANT SunTrust’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
1. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The following undisputed facts are taken from the Complaint and the motion papers and exhibits.1 Prior to 2004, Michelle Mahese (later known as Michelle Rampersad)…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Specialized Loan Servicing, L.L.C. v. JanuarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013