Officers for Justice v. Civil Service Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
I
This appeal requires us to review a consent decree negotiated in settlement of a class action suit challenging allegedly discriminatory employment practices in the San Francisco Police Department. Jesse Byrd, a named party plaintiff and class representative, renews the objections to the settlement that he raised in the court below. The district court, 473 F.Supp. 801, rejected his and others’ objections and entered judgment. We now affirm the district court’s order validating and approving the consent decree.
II
Most of the pertinent background of this lawsuit…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- 29 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1473, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,064 the Officers for Justice, and Jesse J. Byrd v. The Civil Service Commission of the City and County of San Francisco, United States of America v. The City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- 31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1707, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,668 Gloria Holmes v. Continental Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Adoma v. University of Phoenix, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,576 Securities and Exchange Commission v. James H. Randolph, Jr., and Charles BlackardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1989
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.