Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Royal League

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 7, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

An action in assumpsit was instituted by appellee against appellant in the City Court of East St. Louis on a beneficiary certificate issued by appellant. The certificate in the first instance was issued on June 19, 1906, and was made payable to the father of Charles C. Hatch, as beneficiary. Thereafter, on May 4, 1917, said certificate was canceled and a new certificate was issued in which appellee was named as beneficiary. The insured died November 6,1920.

The declaration is in the usual form setting forth the certificate in full, and alleging that Charles C. Hatch, the insured, died on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Libby, McNeill & Libby v. CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Continental Life Insurance v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Schrœder v. Merchants & Mechanics' InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Benes v. Bankers Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Bush v. HansonIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bethke v. Cosmopolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API