Legal Opinion

State v. Standish

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1887PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Miami District Court. Prosecution for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law. From a judgment against him at the June Term, 1887, the defendant Standish appeals. The material facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

Standish was convicted of a violation of §16 of the act to prohibit the manufacture and sale of intoxicating liquors. (Laws of 1881, ch. 128.) He was sentenced to be confined in the county jail of his county for forty-five days, and to pay the costs of the prosecution. He appeals to this court.

It appears that, on June 11, 1887, the grand jury of Miami county returned an indictment against him, containing three counts. The first count charged that at a certain place in Miami county he did, “on or about the month of May, 1887, unlawfully…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. K v. HWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  3. State v. GibbsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  4. Rice v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
  5. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Iola v. LedererSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Harris v. HardestySupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. State v. RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Chapman v. BoyntonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1933
  5. State v. FulkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API