Legal Opinion
New Era Construction v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 5, 1990No. 89-1234PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Board of Contract Appeals (Board) dismissing, for lack of jurisdiction, a claim against the Department based upon an alleged contract between the Department and a contractor. New Era Constr., HUD BCA No. 88-3406-C6, 89-1 B.C.A. ¶ 21,376, at 107,736. We affirm.
I
A. The appellant, New Era Construction (New Era), entered into a so-called “turnkey contract” with the Indian Housing Authority of the Sac and Fox Tribe of Missouri (Housing Authority), under which New Era was to construct…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Housing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- D. R. Smalley & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Correlated Development Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
3Cited by45 opinions
- D & N Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Bonneville Associates, John N. Owens, and MacHan Hampshire Properties, Ltd. v. United States v. Camco Construction Co., Third Party-Defendant/appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Wesleyan Company, Inc. v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Fifth Third Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Rockies Express Pipeline LLC v. InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.