Legal Opinion

Upper Valley Ass'n for Handicapped Citizens v. Mills

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided May 1, 1996No. 2:94-CV-320PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SESSIONS, District Judge.

This is a civil rights action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, brought on behalf of children with disabilities, their families and supportive organizations1 for alleged violations of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq. There are pendent state law claims as well.

On August 28, 1995, Defendants moved to dismiss this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b). Plaintiffs oppose this motion. On November 15, 1995, Plaintiffs moved to amend their complaint. Defendants oppose this motion. For the reasons stated below,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,005 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corporation and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Association Of Mexican-American Educators v. State Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. The Association Of Mexicanamerican Educators v. State Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. UPPER VALLEY ASS'N FOR HANDICAPPED v. MillsDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API