Bartosik v. Chicago River & Indiana Railroad
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matohett
In an action on the case under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, Cahill’s St. ch. 114, f 321 et seq., at the close of all the evidence, defendant moved for an instruction in its favor, which was denied. The cause was submitted to a jury which returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $30,000, and the court, overruling motions for a new trial and in arrest, entered judgment which defendant seeks to reverse by this appeal.
The declaration was in three counts. The first count alleged in substance that defendant was a common carrier engaged in interstate commerce; that it maintained in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McCann for Use of Osterman v. Continental Cas. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1955