Legal Opinion

Bartosik v. Chicago River & Indiana Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 28, 1932No. Gen. No. 35,417PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matohett

In an action on the case under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, Cahill’s St. ch. 114, f 321 et seq., at the close of all the evidence, defendant moved for an instruction in its favor, which was denied. The cause was submitted to a jury which returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $30,000, and the court, overruling motions for a new trial and in arrest, entered judgment which defendant seeks to reverse by this appeal.

The declaration was in three counts. The first count alleged in substance that defendant was a common carrier engaged in interstate commerce; that it maintained in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCann for Use of Osterman v. Continental Cas. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API