Legal Opinion

Barker v. Wagner Mining Equipment, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 12, 1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

Claimant appeals from adverse rulings on his claim for compensation for injuries received in an off-the-premises accident, which he claims arose “out of and in the course of employment.” ORS 656.002(6).

Claimant was employed in defendant’s factory on the swing shift — 4:30 p.m. to 12:30 a.m. The union contract which set the hours and pay for the claimant required him to work for seven and one-half hours per shift for which he was paid a sum equivalent to “eight (8) times the regular hourly day rate, plus fifteen (15) cents per hour.” The day shift worked eight hours for eight hours’ pay. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Jordan v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Livingston v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Montgomery v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Willis v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adamson v. Dalles Cherry Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Turner v. DRUMMOND COMPANY, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  3. Compensation of Allbee v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. J a K Pizza, Inc. - Domino's v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. Kringen v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API