Legal Opinion

Riley v. Kump

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 21, 1927No. 25,797PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Action for the establishment of the boundary between the north and south halves of a lot in Northfield. The decision below was for plaintiff and defendant appeals from the order denying his motion for amended findings or a new trial.

The complaint avers the practical location of the boundary in 1903 by plaintiff and a former owner of the entire lot from whom he purchased his portion, the line so established being marked by a fence then in existence, and that the line so established has ever since existed and constituted the true boundary. Plaintiff avers ownership by adverse possession of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ehle v. ProsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Mellenthin v. BrantmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  3. Deacon v. HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API