Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Eaton

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 5, 1954No. 213, Docket 22973PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents yet another problem in the considerable series we have had involving the meaning of “purchase” and “sale” as used in § 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b), holding short-swing profits from dealings by “insiders” in securities of a corporation recoverable for the benefit of the corporation. Our earlier decisions are cited and discussed hereinafter. Before us now is the question whether a district court erred in declining to hold a reclassification of company stock to be a “purchase” within the statutory meaning.

From its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Park & Tilford, Inc. v. SchulteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Blau v. Mission Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  3. Shaw v. DreyfusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. Truncale v. BlumbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  5. Blau v. HodgkinsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Kern County Land Co. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,924 American Standard, Inc. v. Crane Co., and Third-Party v. Edward J. Hanley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Nicholas Ferraiolo v. F. R. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  4. Blau v. LambCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  5. Isadore Blau v. Max Factor & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API