Legal Opinion

Eisenson Electric Service Co. v. Wien

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Isidob Wassebvogel,

Spec. Eef. Plaintiff, together with other cross-complaining lienors, seeks in this consolidated action to foreclose mechanics’ liens filed by them against the interests of Shelton Hotel Associates, the defendant owner of the fee, Shelton 525 Lexington Corp., the defendant sublessee in possession, and S. T. Hotel Corp., the owner of the sublease at the time of the commencement of this action.

On or about March 27,1953 defendants Wien, Helmsley, Lane and Purcell, doing business as Shelton Hotel Associates, purchased the fee of the Hotel Shelton, located at 49th Street and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. National Wall Paper Co. v. . SireNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Hankinson v. . VantineNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Rice v. . CulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. De Klyn v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. P. Delany & Co. v. DuvouNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. G & H Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Kew Management Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1963
  2. Backstatter v. Berry Hill Building Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Forte v. Roc Hill Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In re Wythe Berry Fee Owner LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
  5. Kiell v. AAC Employment Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API