Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 5, 1985No. C1-85-589PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Gerry Brown appeals from two convictions of aggravated robbery. Brown contends that a drug treatment center violated a federal statute when it released information to the police, that improper remarks by his trial attorney in closing argument deprived him of effective assistance of counsel, and that there was insufficient evidence to establish his guilt. We affirm.

FACTS

On September 7, 1984 at about 11:00 p.m., Pamela Harwell and Linda Eckhardt went to the Artist’s Quarter Bar in Minneapolis. Both testified that Brown approached them and found a waitress to take their…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. State v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GulleksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Sanderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. State v. Center for Drug-Free Living, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  5. Sanderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API