Legal Opinion

Russell v. Cain

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 21, 2023No. 2:18-cv-01827Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON ERIC DESHAUNTE RUSSELL, Case No. 2:18-cv-01827-MC Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. BRAD CAIN, Respondent. ____________________________ MCSHANE, District Judge. Petitioner, an adult in the custody of the Oregon Department of Corrections, brings this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

challenging his convictions for robbery, kidnapping, and assault. Respondent maintains that this action is barred by the statute of limitations, and, alternatively, that Petitioner’s claims are procedurally defaulted. I agree that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API