Legal Opinion

United States v. Huggins

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 18, 1981No. SPCM 15774PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FOREMAN, Judge:

The appellant was convicted of three specifications of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921 (1976). These specifications alleged that, at the same time and place, the appellant stole a radio from a Private Gannon, a radio from a Specialist Four Floyd, and $597.00 in currency from Specialist Floyd. The appellant made no motions and entered pleas of guilty to all charges.

The appellant explained to the military judge during the inquiry into the providence of his pleas that he shared a room in the barracks with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. HardenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. PosnickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. HuntUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  5. United States v. WallsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. JeffersonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. JohnsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  3. United States v. CurryU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
  4. United States v. MobleyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  5. United States v. FosterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API