Edward Raymond Ege, Joseph Boyd and Joseph Victor Bruno v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.
Ege, Boyd and Bruno have run afoul of the Mann Act. 1 A young California girl who had renamed herself Cindy was their pawn.
As a child through the normal school years, Cindy had been moved from one foster home to another. After nine years of school, she started to work. She was employed as a clerk by three San Francisco concerns, each in rapid succession. She then graduated to the chorus line of the burlesque follies. She seems to have been an habitue of the Sarong Club in San Francisco. At least in 1953 that club had among its clientele persons like the defendants Ege…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Cramer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Haupt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- La Page v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- James J. Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Christina Marie ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. WeingartenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Patricia L. Jones, A/K/A Cassie. United States of America v. Mark C. SungCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- James Melvin Lucas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Claude Nolan Green, United States of America v. Franklin JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.