Winchell v. Sanger
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to obtain a new trial, for an injunction and other equitable relief, brought to the Superior Court in Hew Haven County and tried to the court, Thayer, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendants, and appeal by certain of the plaintiffs for alleged errors in the findings and, rulings of the court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, C. J.
We think the plaintiffs’ motion for the amendment of the finding should be allowed, so far as to put into the finding paragraphs 11 and 26 of their proposed finding. These paragraphs are marked “ proven ” by the judge, and they are essential to the questions of law which the plaintiffs present.
Taking the controlling facts of the case from the finding, and condensing them closely, we have this condition of things: Lura Bailey and Marietta Bailey were maiden sisters. They were quite advanced in years and were greatly broken in health and body. Marietta was blind. They had lived with their…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thompson v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
- Peck v. BotsfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
- Tarbell v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Fall v. McMurdyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
- Weeks v. GibbsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- O'Connor v. ChiascioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Ward v. MagahaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Black v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Jarvis v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Roth v. RavichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.