Legal Opinion
Matter of Hazelhurst
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 29, 2016No. M-1548PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Dawn M. Hazelhurst was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on February 6, 1984 as Dawn Marie Hazelhurst. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within this Department.
In March 2014, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee (the Committee) sought respondent’s immediate suspension based upon alleged admissions made under oath that she had converted client funds and upon other uncontested evidence of professional misconduct (i.e., bank records) (Rules…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- In re AmpelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re BirnbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re NeufeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re AlbaneseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re MunzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Matter of CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Matter of FarinellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Matter of MessianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Matter of PierreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019