Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Thompson

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, Monroe county. Action by Charles F. Goodwin against Josephine Thompson. From an order granting a motion to strike out certain paragraphs of the answer as sham and the residue of the answer as frivolous and for judgment, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

The action was brought to foreclose a mortgage, made by Ella H. Clements to Charles O. Peckens, of date May 1,1894, on certain premises situated on south side of Raymond street, in the city of Rochester, to secure the payment of $1,700. The mortgage with the bond was assigned by Peckens to the plaintiff August 10, 1894. The complaint alleges that the defendant, Thompson, has or claims to have some interest in or claim upon the premises, which accrued subsequently to the lien of the mortgage. The defendant by her answer alleged that, on or about July 10,1894, she made to Ella H. Clements a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. . Metropolitan National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Starin v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Simpson v. . Del HoyoNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Hill v. . HooleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Farnsworth v. HalsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. D. & G. Girl Coat Co. v. KafkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. Hespe v. Corning Glass Works, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935
  3. Horvath v. BrettschneiderNew York City Court · 1928
  4. Rochkind v. PerlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Rochkind v. PerlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API