Legal Opinion

In Re Maxton

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 27, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Petitioner, an inmate, has submitted sixty-four pro se petitions over the past three years, including forty-six so far this year, asking this Court to hear matters in its original jurisdiction or issue various extraordinary writs. Each petition submitted by petitioner has been frivolous and dismissed pursuant to Key v. Currie, 305 S.C. 115, 406 S.E.2d 356 (1991), because no extraordinary reason existed to entertain the matter in the original jurisdiction of this Court.

Despite the fact that petitioner has been informed numerous times that it is not appropriate to raise these matters…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. In Re SindramSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. In Re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Clovis Carl Green, Jr. v. Warden, U.S. PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Debro Siddig Abdul-Akbar v. Watson, Robert J. Darcy Watson Walter Redman Kay Jacobs U.S. District Court Delaware Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mehdipour v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. Mehdipour v. State Ex Rel. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. Lakes v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Mehdipour v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  5. Mehdipour v. State Ex Rel. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API