Shaw v. Irvin

Concurring Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice Bell:

The trial Court granted defendants’ motion for a compulsory nonsuit, which it refused to take off. The judgment of nonsuit was affirmed by this Court.

I am convinced there is so much confusion among the members of the bar on the subject of exclusive control that it is wise to review the subject and to reiterate the controlling principles.

Considering the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom and all conflicts therein in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, as the law requires: Steiner v. Pittsburgh Railways Co., 415 Pa. 549, 204 A. 2d…