Legal Opinion

Lippman v. Lippman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s fourth cause of action was properly dismissed on the ground of res judicata. The doctrine of res judicata, or claim preclusion, dictates that "[a] judgment in one action is conclusive in a later one not only as to any matters actually litigated therein, but also as to any that might have been so litigated, when the two causes of action have such a measure of identity that a different judgment in the second would destroy or impair rights or interests established by the first” (Schuykill Fuel Corp. v Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 NY…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crossroads Cogeneration Corporation v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. Summer v. SummerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Crossroads v. Orange & RocklandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Varieur v. VarieurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API