Parreira v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.
We are asked to decide whether Anthony Parreira (defendant), whose guilty plea was vacated as the product of judicial coercion, may be retried consistent with principles of double jeopardy. Because the circumstances of the trial do not support an inference that the trial judge acted out of a desire to preempt an acquittal by the jury, and because the Commonwealth presented sufficient evidence to support a conviction on both charges, we conclude that retrial is appropriate.
1. Background, a. Facts. The defendant’s claims require, among other things, consideration of the legal sufficiency of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- United States v. TateoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Commonwealth v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Commonwealth v. JoyceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- Andrews v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Commonwealth v. WentworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.