Legal Opinion

Ross v. Kell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 31, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

J. B. Ross instituted this suit in the county court of Hood county to probate a certain instrument in writing purporting to be the last will and testament of M. Kell, deceased; Ross being named as independent executor of the will. Texanna Kell and Mrs. Christina Foreman, daughters of the deceased, were the principal beneficiaries of the will. Mat L. Kell and T. J. Kell, two of the sons of the deceased, contested the application for the probate of the instrument, but in the county court the contest was overruled, and the .will duly admitted to probate. The contestants appealed the case to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co v. GormleyTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Brown v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. Martin v. McAdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Simon v. MiddletonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Jamison v. DooleyTexas Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Leahy v. TimonTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Clark v. BrileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. McKibban v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Dodson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Perdue v. PerdueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API