Legal Opinion

In Re: Dirisu Ojo Momoh

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 6, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-0822PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Amit P. Mehta, United States District

Dirisu Ojo Momoh appeals from a Bank'ruptcy Court determination that his debt to Victor Osayande is not dischargeable because Momoh obtained the money he owes by fraud. Momoh contends that the Bankruptcy Court erred in reaching that conclusion because the record evidence demonstrates he did not intend to deceive Osayande, but, in fact, repaid Osayande in part, thereby establishing Momoh’s intent to repay Osayande. Upon review of the record and consideration of the parties’ briefs, the court affirms the ruling of the Bankruptcy Court.

I

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. RitzSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Bennett v. KigginsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cabrera v. Mogoo, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  2. First Look Media Works, Inc. v. U.S. Agency for Global MediaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  3. Nasreen v. Capital Petroleum Group, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  4. Thomas v. MorelandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  5. Thomas v. MorelandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API