Spicher v. State

WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., J.

Casey A. Spicher ("Spicher") appeals from the judgment of the motion court, following an evidentiary hearing, denying his amended Rule 24.0351 motion to set aside his convictions for felony sexual assault and deviate sexual assault. In one point on appeal, Spicher asserts the motion court clearly erred in denying his post-conviction motion, because plea counsel was ineffective for failing to inform him that filing a motion to suppress statements he gave to law enforcement would "constitute a viable defense to the charged crime." Because the motion court's denial of…