Stragliati v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Presiding Judge
Introduction
Appellant Teresa Stragliati ("Stragliati") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying her Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Stragliati argues she was entitled to both an evidentiary hearing and post-conviction relief because she alleged facts, not refuted by the record, showing plea counsel was ineffective in failing to file a motion to suppress the drug evidence seized incident to her arrest. We hold Stragliati was not entitled to evidentiary hearing or post-conviction relief because she failed to demonstrate how a motion to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Meadors v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Jabyn Micheaux v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
- State of Missouri v. Ronda Sue ReeterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019