Legal Opinion
United States v. Narvin J. Bordeaux, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 2, 1992No. 92-1032PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Narvin Bordeaux, a Native American, of second degree murder “within the Indian country” in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1111 and 1153. On appeal, Bordeaux argues that the evidence of malice was insufficient to support a murder conviction, that the district court 1 erred in refusing to instruct on the lesser-included offense of voluntary manslaughter, and that Bordeaux’s confession should have been suppressed as involuntary. We affirm.
7. Sufficiency and Weight of the Evidence of Malice.
Bordeaux argues that the district court erred in denying his alternative…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barber v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. John David BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Steven A. Medina and Ronald CrowderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Josef John CasalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Roger Eagle ElkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. John Monroe Kime, Also Known as Jack Kime, United States of America v. Randall Kirk BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. FregosoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Wicahpe George MilkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Willard Makes Room for Them, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. VueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.