Ritter v. Jersey City Dist. Missionary Soc.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
This matter is now before the court on defendants' application to strike the bill of complaint. The ground urged therefor is that the bill does not disclose upon its face an equitable cause of action. The bill alleges that the defendant Reis Reis entered into a contract with the defendant Jersey City District Missionary Society of the Methodist Episcopal Church for the sale to said society of lands described in the bill, and that such lands are subject to certain restrictive covenants mentioned in the bill. Paragraph 4 of the bill alleges that either the defendant Reis Reis or the defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fortesque v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- Underwood v. Herman & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Goater v. ElyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1912
- Marsh v. MarshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
- Trainer v. CalefSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bright v. Forest Hill Park Development Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Sexton v. BatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- State v. CameronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- State v. CameronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Palisades Properties, Inc. v. BradyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963