Legal Opinion

County of Sacramento v. Sandison

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 2009No. C058396PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, Acting P. J.

This is an appeal from an order awarding attorney fees, pursuant to contract, in a contempt proceeding to enforce an injunction to abate a nuisance. 1

Appellant County of Sacramento contends the trial court erred in awarding the fees because (1) there was no final resolution of its claim warranting the finding that respondents were prevailing parties, and (2) the amount of the award should have been limited, under Government Code section 25845 (hereafter section 25845), to the amount of attorney fees incurred by the county. We disagree.

In the published portion of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lundquist v. ReusserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Carver v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Parrott v. MOORING TOWNHOMES ASSN., INC.California Court of Appeal · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Victoria Ryan v. Editions Limited West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Dorsey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Corrigan v. Kent CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Soni v. Cartograph, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API