Legal Opinion
Cloutier v. Cloutier
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 25, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant wife appeals from so much of an order at Special Term as temporarily determined maintenance, pending divorce proceedings. In affirming, we note that courts have repeatedly held that “1 “the remedy for any claimed inequity in awards of temporary alimony, child support or maintenance is a speedy trial where the respective finances of the parties can be ascertained and a permanent award based on the evidence may be made’”” (Vesper v Vesper, 46 AD2d 729; see Woram v Gilliam, 78 AD2d 796; Sterlace v Sterlace, 63 AD2d 450). (Appeal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Woram v. GilliamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Vesper v. VesperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Sterlace v. SterlaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clancy v. ClancyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Williams v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Alberts v. AlbertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Cullen v. CullenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Dueppengiesser v. DueppengiesserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.