Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Elyse De Stefano v. Apts. Downtown, Inc.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 6, 2016No. 14–0820Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMansfield, Justice

I respectfully concur in part and dissent, in part because I disagree with two conclusions reached by the court. In particular, I do not think small claims courts can award unlimited attorneys’ fees without regard to the $5000 jurisdictional limit. Nor do I think the Iowa Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (IURLTA) makes it illegal for the landlord and the tenant of a single-family home to agree that the tenant will be financially responsible for a repair to an exterior door that is vandalized during the tenancy..

I. Small Claims Jurisdiction.

I would hold "that attorneys’ fees count…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Missouri State Life Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Lettenmaier v. Lube Connection, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. Turner v. Zip Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  4. Village Supply Co., Inc. v. Iowa Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. Neubauer v. HostetterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API