City of Atlanta v. McJenkin
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBussell, C. J.
McJenkin was supplied with water by the Atlanta Waterworks. He failed to pay his water bill, and was threatened that the water would be cut off from his premises. McJenkin filed a petition for injunction to restrain the City of Atlanta from cutting off his water until the issue as to whether the bill was correct could be determined. After hearing evidence the trial judge granted an interlocutory restraining order, and exception is taken to this judgment. It is insisted in the brief of the learned counsel for plaintiff in error that the plaintiff’s petition is an effort to set off damages…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McEntee v. . Kingston Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Dodd v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Poole v. Paris Mountain Water Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- Sedalia Brewing Co. v. Sedalia Water Works Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1889
- Benson v. Paris Mountain Water Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schultz v. Town of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Washington Water & Electric Co. v. Pope Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Cintrón v. Mayagüez Light, Power & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1930
- Cintrón v. Mayagüez Light, Power & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1930