Legal Opinion

Meads v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1977No. Docket No. 29118PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Plaintiff Jimmie L. Meads appeals from a 4-1 decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (hereinafter WCAB or Appeal Board) which ruled that he was not entitled to compensation payments for an occupational lung disease. MCLA 418.401 et seq.;* 1 MSA 17.237(401) et seq.; GCR 1963, 806.2(1).

The plaintiff was born on July 7, 1900. He first worked for the defendant in 1926. Throughout his *497employment career, he worked mostly on grinding operations, forming and finishing engine parts. The plaintiff testified that his early jobs were "dry” operations which meant that the air was filled with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories. Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Norris v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Carter v. Kelsey-Hayes CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Lewis v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Tillotson v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meads v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ramos v. Production Steel Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Hilton v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Ramos v. Production Steel Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API