Legal Opinion

State v. McKenney

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 24, 1958No. 6 Div. 30Published

1Opinion

On Application for Rehearing

COLEMAN, Justice.

On application for rehearing, appellee differs with our conclusion on original de*172liverance. We are of opinion that that conclusion is correct and that no useful purpose would be served by enlarging thereon.

Appellee also requests that we say whether or not an agent in a factual situation different from that set out in the record in this case is a merchandise broker within the meaning of the statute with which this case is concerned. This court has said:

“If we were to express an opinion based on facts not shown by the record in this case, that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wilkinson v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Wilkinson v. RoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Jones v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Linehan v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
  5. City of Chicago v. DollarhideAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API