Legal Opinion

State v. Harbison

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 2006No. 24,940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WECHSLER, J.

{1} The State of New Mexico appeals the district court’s grant of Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. The State argues that the district court erred in granting the motion with regard to a rock of crack cocaine Defendant allegedly threw underneath a car before being handcuffed because Defendant was not seized by the arresting officer until he was placed in handcuffs and therefore Defendant abandoned the crack cocaine. The State also argues that Defendant’s seizure was supported by reasonable suspicion. Because we believe, based on the totality of the circumstances,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. State v. Jason L.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  4. United States v. Calvin Edwin Lender, United States of America v. Calvin Edwin LenderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. State v. UriosteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. NealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. HarbisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. NealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API