Legal Opinion

Eason v. Comfort

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 6, 1990No. 89-37PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Ronald Eason, was injured when he was struck by an automobile driven by the defendant, Julie Comfort.1 The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant in his action seeking money damages based on his injuries.

The evidence tended to show that 60-year-old Eason arrived at his home at approximately 4:50 p.m. on the date of the accident, and was joined by two colleagues, Larry Stanfield and Mike White; that while at home, Eason drank two martinis, each of which, he said, contained approximately two jiggers, or about three ounces, of vodka that was "diluted" with an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zaharavich v. Clingerman by and Through ClingermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Baker v. Merry-Go-Round Roller Rink, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Dees v. GilleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Interstate Engineering, Inc. v. BurnetteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Bradford v. KimbroughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Acceptance Ins. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. City of Birmingham v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Murphy v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Gober v. KhalafSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Gulledge v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API