Commonwealth v. Young
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bt
Hirt, J.,
Defendant was convicted of sodomy, committed with one Kathryn Hrinkovich as charged in Bill 20, and also of sodomy on two occasions upon Eva Dora Daniels, charged in Bill 19. The Daniels girl then was but 15 years old, and the defendant in a third indictment, Bill 21, was charged with contributing to her delinquency. As to her the jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court had attached (Cf. Commonwealth v. Wink, 170 Pa. Superior Ct. 96, 103, 84 A. 2d 398) and the defendant was convicted also of this charge. Prison sentences, to run concurrently, were imposed in each case.
On…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Commonwealth v. ValloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Commonwealth v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. HippleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Commonwealth v. GableSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. BouldenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955